In "The Great Lawsuit: Man v Men, Woman v Women," Margaret Fuller explores the possibility of equality between the sexes. Her discussion covers a BROAD range of ideas and examples about ways this equality has (or has not) been worked out. One person she discusses in George Sand. George Sand was a well-known woman writer who dressed and behaved as a man.
For Fuller, the significance of this is not necessarily sexual. What does she say about it (p754)?
How is CLOTHING a part of BEHAVIOR?
Body Politic: Revolutionary Fashions or A Message without a Moral
Humanities - the study of the art of being human - allows us to read all these things as texts. Today we're going to look at the way the female body has historically been used as a canvas to express social, cultural, religious, and political ideologies.
Eighteenth-Century: French Court Fashion
Court Dress 1780s (France)
How does this dress construct the female body?
How does this dress transform the female body into an icon of political power?
Why doesn't Fuller address this kind of power in her text? IS THIS POWER?
Fashioning Gender Identity in Eighteenth-Century Clothing
Can you tell which of these details is for a woman's outfit and which is for a man?
As the fashions of the aristocratic elite were adopted by the emerging middle class, their inherent gender ambiguity was criticized. Periodicals such as The Tatler and The Spectator helped transform aristocratic fashions for the increasingly polarized social spheres of men and women. Men's clothing became increasingly austere and functional while women's fashions continued to function as status symbols and embrace the extravagance that characterized eighteenth-century aristocratic clothing.
Group Work: Gender Difference
What does Margaret Fuller say about gender difference (757 and following)? How does it function? How is it parodied?
The 1790s: Revolution in Fashion
During the 1790s and the first decades of the 1800s, women's fashions changed dramatically.
Woman's Day Gown ca. 1800
The simple, high-waisted shifts of worn from 1790 - 1810 resemble the UNDERCLOTHES of earlier decades. These dresses were truly "revolutionary" - keeping in step with the political and social movements of the 1790s.
Corset, panniers, and Chemise (ca. 1760-1770).
However, these changes in women's fashions were as short lived. By the 1820s, simple shifts were again regulated to the role of underwear. Industrialization, the expanding wealth of the middle class, and the goading of fashion magazines created an elaborate culture of women's fashion.
Corset, Chemise, and Draws ca. 1830
During the Victorian Era, women's court fashions became the fashions of the public, fueled by the industrial revolution. By contrast, men's fashions became more practical (in fact, it was the last major change for men's fashion in the modern world).
Thus, the Victorian Era was marked by the construction of gender through clothing that was mass-produced by the industrial era.
During the 1800s, woman's body was literally shaped by the clothing (and devices) she wore. Her clothing indicated her place in the social hierarchy as well as her mastery of current etiquette. During the nineteenth-century, the full skirts and constricted waists of the eighteenth-century court culture permeated the middle class.
Women's fashion was characterized by the CORSET, petticoat, and CRINOLINE.
This page shows the evolution of female silhouette throughout the nineteenth-century. How does the fashion of men's clothing change throughout the century? What is the significance of this difference for nineteenth-century culture?
Day Dress, ca 1820
Notice the expanding figure of female fashion - this dress requires a corset and petticoats.
By the middle of the century women need a corset and hoop skirt to create the desired fashion.
Day Dress, 1860.
CORSETS:
Corsets were an ESSENTIAL part of a woman's attire. Some medical experts in the nineteenth-century claimed that the corset compensated for a woman's natural deficiencies (they claimed that a woman's spine was too weak to support her body, especially after puberty, and a corset was necessary to give her the support she needed to stand upright).
How do advertisements like this position the women's fashion with power matrices?
These corsets are a part of the fashion exhibit in the Victorian and Albert Museum in London.
Corsets were generally worn from the age of twelve, onwards. These restrictive devices could actually compress a woman's ribcage, causing permanent damage. However, women who did not wear corsets were immediately labeled "loose" women. Furthermore, the corset was thought to impose MORALITY upon the unruly (sexual) female body, curbing the appetites that resided in the torso and mid-section (See "Crinolines, Crinolettes, Bustles and Corsests from 1860-80").
This photograph from the 1890s features a woman who has tight-laced her corset to achieve what is referred to as a WASP WAIST. However, this extreme was the exception rather than the rule.
HOOP SKIRTS AND CRINOLINES:
The hoop skirt came BACK into fashion in the 1850s (just after Frankenstein). The hoop skirt, combined with the corset, emphasized a woman's ARTIFICIALLY TINY waist and accentuated her bust and hips (her figure - her sexuality).
Evening Dress (ca 1860)
This evening dress utilizes a crinoline and a corset rather than a hoop.
Cage Crinoline (ça 1870)
Rigid hoop skirts were replaced by the more flexible crinoline cage in the later-decades of the nineteenth-century.
The hoop skirt or crinoline, combined with the corset, forced women to (outwardly) conform to mid-nineteenth-century ideals of feminine passivity because these two devices effectually rendered women unable to engage in (meaningful) physical activity.
Corsets restricted breathing, effectively stopping women from engaging in strenuous (or normal) physical activities.
A tight corset forced women to take shallow breaths (creating the sexually alluring "heaving bodice" effect)/
Wearing a corset for a prolonged period of time (since age twelve) forced the ribcage to conform to an UNNATURAL hour-glass form that could be life-threating, especially during childbirth.
Hoop skirts hampered any sort of movement, surrounding women in a (barely) mobile cage of wire, cloth, and crinoline. Even movement within the domestic sphere was very difficult (as the cartoon below states).
Hoop skirts and crinolines were more than a nuisance, they were a FIRE HAZARD. Some estimate that the second leading cause of death among women (in the West in the nineteenth century) was FIRE (burns). Cloth was ESPECIALLY flammable in this era and big skirts were FREQUENTLY catching fire. Even if women refrained from working in the kitchen (genteel British women were supposed to supervise the kitchen, not work in it), they were constantly surrounded by fire and their skirts were often ignited. Since women's clothing was DESIGNED to be difficult to remove, women could not get free of their burning clothes and they died (often in agony, days later).
This is a nineteenth century cartoon demonstrates that people were COGNIZANT of the annoyance (and irrationality) of fashions (just as we are aware of our own fashion hang-ups).
This illustration shows a woman's crinoline catching on the door of a carriage. While the footman may be laughing at the spectacle, accidents like this could be hazardous (the woman could be caught and dragged behind the carriage, trampled in the busy London street...).
Reception Dress (ca. 1880)
This reception dress from the 1880s relies on a corset and bustle. Women's skirt widths steadily decrease after the middle of the century, but they still require artificial support.
Women's clothing in the nineteenth-century was supposed to serve as a middle-class STATUS symbol. The fashions that denoted the opulence of the aristocracy and upper-class in the 1700s permeated the ever-growing middle-class during the 1800s. Clothing that immobilized a woman demonstrated the wealth of her father or husband, indicating that she had servants and a lady's maid.
Fashions that had been associated with court culture in the eighteenth-century were associated with the nineteenth-century idealization of the middle-class domestic sphere. For example, the fashion plate below is from the Englishwoman's Domestic Magazine. Magazines throughout the nineteenth-century marketed the corse, hoop-skirt, and crinoline to middle-class women.
Fuller and the Humanity of Women:
Fuller analyzes and discusses the HUMANITY of women (760). How does Fuller see this humanity playing itself out? What literary allusions does she use to describe women's humanity? Is this ironic?
Creating clothing in the domestic sphere:
This Lozier and Stokes sewing machine advertisement positions women's clothing and the creation of that clothing at the center of the domestic sphere.
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.