Name (paper): _______________________Name (reviewer): _________________________
American Literature I Final Paper Rubric
|
|
Satisfactory
|
Unsatisfactory
|
Comments
|
|
Organization
|
Strong thesis at the conclusion of the introduction to guide the paper.
Thesis connected and supported in all body paragraphs.
Thesis makes a strong argument about a single theme or idea using the primary text and artifact.
Discussion of the primary text and artifact is coherent and succinct.
|
Thesis is vague or spread throughout the introduction and the paper.
Thesis is not clearly connected to all body paragraphs.
Thesis does not make a strong argument the primary text and/or artifact.
|
The thesis should tie into the theme of Harriet Jacobs, rather than slavery alone.
|
|
Close Reading
|
Analyzes a theme from American Literature in or through a primary text and artifact.
Close reading brings the primary text and artifact together in meaningful ways.
Places close reading in conversation with secondary sources.
Summarizes and paraphrases evidence from the primary text to support the close reading (only using direct quotes when it is necessary to analyze the language).
|
Does not clearly analyze a theme from American Literature in or through a primary text and/or artifact.
Close reading does not relate the primary text and artifact in meaningful ways (although it may discuss both separately).
Does not situate close reading among secondary sources.
Primarily summarizes the text or quotes it (rather than analyzing it).
|
I did not read about a mention of an artifact, however, the theme itself is very well presented!
|
|
Support (Research)
|
Integrates support from secondary sources to support close reading.
Creates a clear conversation with secondary sources (without being overpowered by them).
Uses strong evidence from secondary sources.
Summarizes and paraphrases evidence except when quotations are necessary.
|
Does not integrate support from secondary sources.
Argument is either overpowered or disconnected from secondary sources.
Evidence from secondary sources is not clearly connected with the argument.
Uses unnecessary quotes from the secondary source.
|
Seems to have good supporting information.
|
|
Pre-Writing
|
Completed all pre-writing activities on-time (including conferences and rough draft workshop)
|
Did not complete all pre-writing activities on-time.
|
|
Return to Roster
My name is Luke Lilly.
Major: Sports Medicine
Something about me: I play tennis for Bluefield College.
AmLitJournal1.docx
Assignment- Primary Text Journal: Using the databases The Nineteenth Century in Print and Making of America Project (also see the Making of American Project - Cornell) or the Library of Congress finding an artifact from before 1865 (10pts).
-
-
-
- This image was for on the Library of Congress and the description for the purpose of this document was “The text contains arguments for abolition and an accounting of atrocities of the system.”
- Possible Primary Text #1
- The Norton Anthology: American Literature (beginnings to 1865)
- Pages 818-839
- Harriet Jacobs
-
- Possible Primary Text #2
- The Norton Anthology: American Literature (beginnings to 1865)
- Pages 1184-1189
- Frances Ellen Watkins Harper
-
- Possible Primary Text #3
- The Norton Anthology: American Literature (beginning to 1865)
- Pages 802-813
-
Works Cited
Baym, Nina, Robert S. Levine, and Arnold Krupat. The Norton Anthology of American Literature. New York: W. W. Norton, 2007. Print.
Slave Market of America, 1836. Alexandria, Virginia. The Library of Congress. By William S. Dorr and The Anti-Slavery Society. Web. 17 September 2015.
AmLitJournal2.docx (remember to put your name in the file name so that it does not get replaced by another)
AmLitJournal3LLilly.docx
LukeLillyJournal4.docx
AmLitJournal5LukeLilly.docx
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.